RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2070 Super with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2070 Super
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 215 Watt
47.23
+2.3%

RTX 2070 Super outperforms RTX 2000 Ada Generation by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7072
Place by popularity88not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation42.1681.72
Power efficiency15.6947.09
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU104AD107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date9 July 2019 (5 years ago)12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 $649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has 94% better value for money than RTX 2070 Super.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602816
Core clock speed1605 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)215 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate283.2187.4
Floating-point processing power9.062 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs16088
Tensor Cores32088
Ray Tracing Cores4022

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mm168 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.58.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2070 Super 47.23
+2.3%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 46.15

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2070 Super 18227
+2.3%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17810

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

RTX 2070 Super 99350
+14.1%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 87038

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

RTX 2070 Super 98859
+16.9%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 84559

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD134
+3.1%
130−140
−3.1%
1440p81
+8%
75−80
−8%
4K53
+6%
50−55
−6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 94
+4.4%
90−95
−4.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 104
+4%
100−105
−4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 88
+3.5%
85−90
−3.5%
Battlefield 5 183
+7.6%
170−180
−7.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 119
+8.2%
110−120
−8.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 84
+5%
80−85
−5%
Far Cry 5 149
+6.4%
140−150
−6.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 158
+5.3%
150−160
−5.3%
Forza Horizon 4 277
+2.6%
270−280
−2.6%
Hitman 3 116
+5.5%
110−120
−5.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 279
+3.3%
270−280
−3.3%
Metro Exodus 144
+2.9%
140−150
−2.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 122
+10.9%
110−120
−10.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 203
+6.8%
190−200
−6.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 229
+4.1%
220−230
−4.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 172
+7.5%
160−170
−7.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 74
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
Battlefield 5 172
+7.5%
160−170
−7.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120
+9.1%
110−120
−9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+4%
75−80
−4%
Far Cry 5 120
+9.1%
110−120
−9.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 120
+9.1%
110−120
−9.1%
Forza Horizon 4 258
+3.2%
250−260
−3.2%
Hitman 3 113
+2.7%
110−120
−2.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 270
+3.8%
260−270
−3.8%
Metro Exodus 144
+2.9%
140−150
−2.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 92
+8.2%
85−90
−8.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 198
+4.2%
190−200
−4.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
+7.8%
90−95
−7.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 215
+2.4%
210−220
−2.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65
+8.3%
60−65
−8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 66
+10%
60−65
−10%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 91
+7.1%
85−90
−7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 73
+4.3%
70−75
−4.3%
Far Cry 5 83
+3.8%
80−85
−3.8%
Forza Horizon 4 153
+9.3%
140−150
−9.3%
Hitman 3 104
+4%
100−105
−4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 156
+4%
150−160
−4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 167
+4.4%
160−170
−4.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+5.3%
95−100
−5.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 68
+4.6%
65−70
−4.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 114
+3.6%
110−120
−3.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 118
+7.3%
110−120
−7.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 86
+7.5%
80−85
−7.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 57
+3.6%
55−60
−3.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 53
+6%
50−55
−6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 73
+4.3%
70−75
−4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
Far Cry 5 66
+10%
60−65
−10%
Forza Horizon 4 255
+6.3%
240−250
−6.3%
Hitman 3 71
+9.2%
65−70
−9.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 118
+7.3%
110−120
−7.3%
Metro Exodus 91
+7.1%
85−90
−7.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 123
+2.5%
120−130
−2.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 215
+2.4%
210−220
−2.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95
+5.6%
90−95
−5.6%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55
+10%
50−55
−10%
Far Cry New Dawn 48
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%
Hitman 3 42
+5%
40−45
−5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 129
+7.5%
120−130
−7.5%
Metro Exodus 78
+4%
75−80
−4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+4.6%
65−70
−4.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 39
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 44
+10%
40−45
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Far Cry 5 35
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 84
+5%
80−85
−5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65
+8.3%
60−65
−8.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 29
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 59
+7.3%
55−60
−7.3%

This is how RTX 2070 Super and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super is 3% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Super is 8% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Super is 6% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 47.23 46.15
Recency 9 July 2019 12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 215 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 2070 Super has a 2.3% higher aggregate performance score.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 207.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 2070 Super and RTX 2000 Ada Generation.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Super is a desktop card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GeForce RTX 2070 Super
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4811 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 24 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.