Radeon 630 vs GeForce 930MX

Place in performance ranking	702	705
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.08	0.50
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code name	N16S-GMR	Lexa
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	10 March 2016 (8 years ago)	12 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price	$1808	$65

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Radeon 630 has 525% better value for money than GeForce 930MX.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	512
Core clock speed	952 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1020 MHz	1219 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	24.48	38.98
Floating-point performance	783.4 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce 930MX and Radeon 630 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3, GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	112.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost	2.0	no data
Optimus	+	no data
GameWorks	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.1.126	+
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 930MX 3.34
+1.8%

Radeon 630 3.28

GeForce 930MX outperforms Radeon 630 by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce 930MX 1290
+1.7%

Radeon 630 1269

GeForce 930MX outperforms Radeon 630 by 2% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

17
+6.3%

16−18

−6.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

8
+33.3%

6−7

−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10 +100%	5−6 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Battlefield 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	15 +114%	7−8 −114%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Hitman 3	12 +50%	8−9 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20 +17.6%	16−18 −17.6%
Metro Exodus	15 +275%	4−5 −275%
Red Dead Redemption 2	13 +62.5%	8−9 −62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	13 +0%	12−14 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9 +200%	3−4 −200%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Battlefield 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Far Cry 5	30 +150%	12−14 −150%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Hitman 3	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16 −6.3%	16−18 +6.3%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	11 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5 −160%	12−14 +160%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10 −70%	16−18 +70%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9

+0%

8−9

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Hitman 3	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

+0%

4−5

+0%

This is how GeForce 930MX and Radeon 630 compete in popular games:

GeForce 930MX is 6% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce 930MX is 275% faster than the Radeon 630.
in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 630 is 160% faster than the GeForce 930MX.

All in all, in popular games:

GeForce 930MX is ahead in 14 tests (23%)
Radeon 630 is ahead in 4 tests (7%)
there's a draw in 42 tests (70%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.34	3.28
Recency	10 March 2016	12 August 2019
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	50 Watt