Arc A770 vs Arc A370M

Place in performance ranking	317	194
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	11.32
Architecture	Xe HPG (2020−2022)	Alchemist
GPU code name	Alchemist	DG2-512
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)	12 October 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$329
Current price	no data	$597 (1.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	8	4096
Core clock speed	1550 MHz	2100 MHz
Boost clock speed	1550 MHz	2400 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt (35 - 50 Watt TGP)	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	99.20	614.4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Arc A370M and Arc A770 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A370M 15.78

Arc A770 25.82
+63.6%

Arc A770 outperforms Arc A370M by 64% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Arc A370M 5115

Arc A770 9984
+95.2%

Arc A770 outperforms Arc A370M by 95% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Arc A370M 12090

Arc A770 41303
+242%

Arc A770 outperforms Arc A370M by 242% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Arc A370M 8149

Arc A770 32666
+301%

Arc A770 outperforms Arc A370M by 301% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Arc A370M 35604

Arc A770 139166
+291%

Arc A770 outperforms Arc A370M by 291% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	38 −192%	111 +192%
1440p	21 −233%	70 +233%
4K	35 −25.7%	44 +25.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

46
+9.5%

40−45

−9.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −103%	65 +103%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	33 −179%	92 +179%
Battlefield 5	50−55 −63.5%	85−90 +63.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −67.6%	55−60 +67.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	37 −13.5%	40−45 +13.5%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −45.2%	60−65 +45.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −59.1%	70−75 +59.1%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +60.6%	33 −60.6%
Hitman 3	55 −14.5%	60−65 +14.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −298%	203 +298%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −200%	144 +200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −54.5%	65−70 +54.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	74 −311%	304 +311%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45 −127%	102 +127%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −75%	56 +75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20 −295%	79 +295%
Battlefield 5	50−55 −63.5%	85−90 +63.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −67.6%	55−60 +67.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	25 −68%	40−45 +68%
Far Cry 5	24 −196%	71 +196%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −29.5%	57 +29.5%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +71%	31 −71%
Hitman 3	35−40 −70.3%	60−65 +70.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −235%	171 +235%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −138%	114 +138%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −54.5%	65−70 +54.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	47 −298%	187 +298%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	53 −270%	196 +270%
Watch Dogs: Legion	34 −174%	93 +174%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −40.6%	45 +40.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18 −300%	72 +300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −67.6%	55−60 +67.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	21 −100%	40−45 +100%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −45.2%	60−65 +45.2%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +130%	23 −130%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −137%	121 +137%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −115%	103 +115%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	26 −177%	72 +177%
Watch Dogs: Legion	15 −393%	74 +393%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45

−54.5%

65−70
+54.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −58.1%	45−50 +58.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 −343%	133 +343%
Hitman 3	21−24 −60.9%	35−40 +60.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −66.7%	20−22 +66.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −150%	40 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	13 −362%	60 +362%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −84.2%	35−40 +84.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −113%	16−18 +113%
Far Cry 5	29 −183%	82 +183%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +100%	15 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −213%	100 +213%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −225%	91 +225%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	37 −327%	158 +327%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −253%	60 +253%
Watch Dogs: Legion	11 −436%	59 +436%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	22 −164%	58 +164%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −419%	83 +419%
Hitman 3	10−12 −81.8%	20−22 +81.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −390%	49 +390%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −387%	73 +387%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −233%	30 +233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −375%	38 +375%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −82.4%	30−35 +82.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −90.9%	21−24 +90.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +163%	8 −163%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −282%	65 +282%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −273%	56 +273%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −517%	37 +517%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−57.1%

21−24
+57.1%

This is how Arc A370M and Arc A770 compete in popular games:

Arc A770 is 192% faster in 1080p
Arc A770 is 233% faster in 1440p
Arc A770 is 26% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A370M is 163% faster than the Arc A770.
in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A770 is 517% faster than the Arc A370M.

All in all, in popular games: