EPYC 9754 vs Xeon w9-3495X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon w9-3495X
2023
56 cores / 112 threads, 350 Watt
60.17
EPYC 9754
2023
128 cores / 256 threads, 360 Watt
65.64
+9.1%

EPYC 9754 outperforms Xeon w9-3495X by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon w9-3495X and EPYC 9754 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1911
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.601.07
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency15.6816.63
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)Bergamo (2023)
Release date15 February 2023 (1 year ago)13 June 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,889$11,900

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w9-3495X has 1638% better value for money than EPYC 9754.

Detailed specifications

Xeon w9-3495X and EPYC 9754 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)128
Threads112256
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.25 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz3.1 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache105 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm5 nm
Die size4x 477 mm28x 73 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)81 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data71,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon w9-3495X and EPYC 9754 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA4677SP5
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon w9-3495X and EPYC 9754. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon w9-3495X and EPYC 9754 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon w9-3495X and EPYC 9754 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon w9-3495X and EPYC 9754. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon w9-3495X and EPYC 9754.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes112128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon w9-3495X 60.17
EPYC 9754 65.64
+9.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon w9-3495X 92087
EPYC 9754 100460
+9.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 60.17 65.64
Recency 15 February 2023 13 June 2023
Physical cores 56 128
Threads 112 256
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 360 Watt

Xeon w9-3495X has 2.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9754, on the other hand, has a 9.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and 128.6% more physical cores and 128.6% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon w9-3495X and EPYC 9754.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon w9-3495X and EPYC 9754, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon w9-3495X
Xeon w9-3495X
AMD EPYC 9754
EPYC 9754

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 176 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3495X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 36 votes

Rate EPYC 9754 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon w9-3495X or EPYC 9754, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.