EPYC 9754 vs Xeon Platinum 8368

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8368
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
60.15
EPYC 9754
2023
128 cores / 256 threads, 360 Watt
65.64
+9.1%

EPYC 9754 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8368 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8368 and EPYC 9754 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2011
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.07
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency20.3116.63
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Bergamo (2023)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)13 June 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,900

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8368 and EPYC 9754 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores38128
Threads76256
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.25 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.1 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache57 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data8x 73 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)83 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data71,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8368 and EPYC 9754 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA4189SP5
Power consumption (TDP)270 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8368 and EPYC 9754. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8368 and EPYC 9754 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8368 and EPYC 9754 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8368 and EPYC 9754. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8368 and EPYC 9754.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes64128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8368 60.15
EPYC 9754 65.64
+9.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8368 92054
EPYC 9754 100460
+9.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 60.15 65.64
Recency 6 April 2021 13 June 2023
Physical cores 38 128
Threads 76 256
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 360 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8368 has 33.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9754, on the other hand, has a 9.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 236.8% more physical cores and 236.8% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Platinum 8368 and EPYC 9754.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8368 and EPYC 9754, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8368
Xeon Platinum 8368
AMD EPYC 9754
EPYC 9754

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 98 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8368 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 36 votes

Rate EPYC 9754 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8368 or EPYC 9754, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.