EPYC 9374F vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8352Y
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
44.85
EPYC 9374F
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 320 Watt
52.16
+16.3%

EPYC 9374F outperforms Xeon Platinum 8352Y by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8352Y and EPYC 9374F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4934
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.23
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency19.9514.86
Architecture codenameno dataGenoa (2022−2023)
Release date1 April 2021 (3 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,850

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8352Y and EPYC 9374F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads6464
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.85 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.85 GHz
Multiplierno data38.5
L1 cacheno data2 MB
L2 cacheno data32 MB
L3 cache48 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data8x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature81 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data52,560 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8352Y and EPYC 9374F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFCLGA4189SP5
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8352Y and EPYC 9374F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8352Y and EPYC 9374F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8352Y and EPYC 9374F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8352Y and EPYC 9374F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size6 TB6 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8352Y and EPYC 9374F.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes64128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y 44.85
EPYC 9374F 52.16
+16.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y 68643
EPYC 9374F 79826
+16.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.85 52.16
Recency 1 April 2021 10 November 2022
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 320 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8352Y has 56.1% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9374F, on the other hand, has a 16.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9374F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8352Y in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8352Y and EPYC 9374F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
AMD EPYC 9374F
EPYC 9374F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 5 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8352Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 9374F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8352Y or EPYC 9374F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.