Xeon W-2123 vs E3-1585 v5
Aggregate performance score
W-2123 outperforms E3-1585 v5 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E3-1585 v5 and Xeon W-2123 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1094 | 1086 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.78 | 23.26 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | Intel Xeon E3 | Intel Xeon W |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Skylake (server) (2017−2019) |
| Release date | 31 May 2016 (8 years ago) | 29 August 2017 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $556 | $294 |
| Current price | $979 (1.8x MSRP) | $30 (0.1x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon W-2123 has 2882% better value for money than Xeon E3-1585 v5.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E3-1585 v5 and Xeon W-2123 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Bus support | 4 × 8 GT/s | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8.25 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 484 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 65 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 64 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E3-1585 v5 and Xeon W-2123 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1440 | FCLGA2066 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1585 v5 and Xeon W-2123. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| eDRAM | 128 MB | no data |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| PAE | no data | 46 Bit |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| FDI | + | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Xeon E3-1585 v5 and Xeon W-2123 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| MPX | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1585 v5 and Xeon W-2123 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1585 v5 and Xeon W-2123. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | LPDDR3-1600, DDR4-2133 | DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 512 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | 85.3 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | no data |
| Max video memory | 64 GB | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | no data |
| Clear Video | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.15 GHz | no data |
| Execution Units | 72 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1585 v5 and Xeon W-2123 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1585 v5 and Xeon W-2123.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 48 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
W-2123 outperforms E3-1585 v5 by 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
W-2123 outperforms E3-1585 v5 by 1% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.44 | 5.51 |
| Recency | 31 May 2016 | 29 August 2017 |
| Cost | $556 | $294 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 120 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E3-1585 v5 and Xeon W-2123.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1585 v5 and Xeon W-2123, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
