i9-14900K vs Processor N200

VS

Aggregate performance score

Processor N200
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.62
Core i9-14900K
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
39.35
+2329%

Core i9-14900K outperforms Processor N200 by a whopping 2329% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Processor N200 and Core i9-14900K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking210079
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data64.25
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-Nno data
Power efficiency24.6228.71
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-N (2023)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024)
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$193$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Processor N200 and Core i9-14900K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed0.1 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.8 GHz
L1 cache96 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Processor N200 and Core i9-14900K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1264FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor N200 and Core i9-14900K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Processor N200 and Core i9-14900K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor N200 and Core i9-14900K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor N200 and Core i9-14900K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channelDDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory sizeno data192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)Intel UHD Graphics 770
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.65 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Processor N200 and Core i9-14900K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Processor N200 and Core i9-14900K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Processor N200 and Core i9-14900K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor N200 and Core i9-14900K.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes916

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Processor N200 1.62
i9-14900K 39.35
+2329%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Processor N200 3937
i9-14900K 12643
+221%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Processor N200 7549
i9-14900K 94801
+1156%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Processor N200 3902
i9-14900K 22773
+484%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Processor N200 25.99
i9-14900K 2.07
+1156%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Processor N200 3
i9-14900K 72
+2546%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Processor N200 219
i9-14900K 6103
+2687%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Processor N200 113
i9-14900K 325
+187%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Processor N200 1.36
i9-14900K 4.02
+196%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Processor N200 3.2
i9-14900K 26.7
+734%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Processor N200 16
i9-14900K 181
+1012%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Processor N200 80
i9-14900K 346
+332%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Processor N200 2115
i9-14900K 16108
+662%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Processor N200 1540
i9-14900K 25199
+1536%

Blender(-)

Processor N200 2150
+2429%
i9-14900K 85

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Processor N200 928
i9-14900K 2369
+155%

7-Zip Single

Processor N200 3230
i9-14900K 7932
+146%

7-Zip

Processor N200 7146
i9-14900K 145207
+1932%

WebXPRT 3

Processor N200 171
i9-14900K 386
+125%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.62 39.35
Integrated graphics card 3.29 6.15
Recency 3 January 2023 17 October 2023
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 32
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 125 Watt

Processor N200 has 1983.3% lower power consumption.

i9-14900K, on the other hand, has a 2329% higher aggregate performance score, 86.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 months, and 500% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

The Core i9-14900K is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Processor N200 is a notebook processor while Core i9-14900K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Processor N200 and Core i9-14900K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Processor N200
Processor N200
Intel Core i9-14900K
Core i9-14900K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 141 vote

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1642 votes

Rate Core i9-14900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Processor N200 or Core i9-14900K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.