Xeon W-3335 vs EPYC 7313

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7313
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
25.54
Xeon W-3335
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 250 Watt
25.68
+0.5%

Xeon W-3335 outperforms EPYC 7313 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7313 and Xeon W-3335 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking198195
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.05no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency15.039.37
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Ice Lake-W (2021)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)29 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,083no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7313 and Xeon W-3335 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3232
Base clock speed3 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache1 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+10 nm
Die size4x 81 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
Number of transistors16,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7313 and Xeon W-3335 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP3FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7313 and Xeon W-3335. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7313 and Xeon W-3335 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7313 and Xeon W-3335 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7313 and Xeon W-3335. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7313 and Xeon W-3335.

PCIe version4.04
PCI Express lanes12864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7313 25.54
Xeon W-3335 25.68
+0.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7313 39091
Xeon W-3335 39293
+0.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.54 25.68
Recency 12 January 2021 29 July 2021
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 250 Watt

EPYC 7313 has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 61.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3335, on the other hand, has a 0.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 6 months.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 7313 and Xeon W-3335.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7313 and Xeon W-3335, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7313
EPYC 7313
Intel Xeon W-3335
Xeon W-3335

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 31 vote

Rate EPYC 7313 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Xeon W-3335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7313 or Xeon W-3335, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.