Pentium G3240 vs Celeron G1850

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G1850
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 53 Watt
1.24
Pentium G3240
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 53 Watt
1.25
+0.8%

Pentium G3240 outperforms Celeron G1850 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1850 and Pentium G3240 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22172204
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.280.25
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)no data
Release date1 May 2014 (10 years ago)1 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$101no data
Current price$41 (0.4x MSRP)$50

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G1850 has 412% better value for money than Pentium G3240.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1850 and Pentium G3240 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache3 MB (shared)3 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size177 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature72 °C72 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1850 and Pentium G3240 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150FCLGA1150
Power consumption (TDP)53 Watt53 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1850 and Pentium G3240. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI--
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP--
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron G1850 and Pentium G3240 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1850 and Pentium G3240 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1850 and Pentium G3240. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s21.3 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processors
Max video memory1.7 GB1.7 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz1.1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1850 and Pentium G3240 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI++
VGA++

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G1850 and Pentium G3240 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x1080@60Hz1920x1080@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP2560x1600@60Hz2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hz2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hz1920x1200@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G1850 and Pentium G3240 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/1211.1/12
OpenGL4.34.3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1850 and Pentium G3240.

PCIe versionUp to 3.0Up to 3.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G1850 1.24
Pentium G3240 1.25
+0.8%

Pentium G3240 outperforms Celeron G1850 by 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron G1850 1915
Pentium G3240 1939
+1.3%

Pentium G3240 outperforms Celeron G1850 by 1% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron G1850 533
+2.1%
Pentium G3240 522

Celeron G1850 outperforms Pentium G3240 by 2% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron G1850 916
+2.7%
Pentium G3240 892

Celeron G1850 outperforms Pentium G3240 by 3% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.24 1.25

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron G1850 and Pentium G3240.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1850 and Pentium G3240, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1850
Celeron G1850
Intel Pentium G3240
Pentium G3240

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate Celeron G1850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 139 votes

Rate Pentium G3240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1850 or Pentium G3240, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.