Radeon RX 6700 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB

Place in performance ranking	28	57
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	27.18
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	AD106	Navi 22
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	18 May 2023 (1 year ago)	9 June 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499	no data
Current price	no data	$551

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4352	2304
Core clock speed	2310 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2535 MHz	2450 MHz
Number of transistors	22,900 million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	175 Watt
Texture fill rate	344.8	352.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	240 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	10 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	18000 MHz	16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	320.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.9	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 59.23
+22.4%

RX 6700 48.41

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Radeon RX 6700 by 22% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 22913
+22.3%

RX 6700 18728

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Radeon RX 6700 by 22% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	168 +29.2%	130−140 −29.2%
1440p	91 +30%	70−75 −30%
4K	55 +37.5%	40−45 −37.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	90−95 +24%	75−80 −24%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−110 +28.8%	80−85 −28.8%
Battlefield 5	180−190 +26%	150−160 −26%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +27%	100−105 −27%
Far Cry 5	100−105 +25%	80−85 −25%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 +29%	100−105 −29%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +24.3%	140−150 −24.3%
Hitman 3	130−140 +26.4%	110−120 −26.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	395 +31.7%	300−310 −31.7%
Metro Exodus	120−130 +24%	100−105 −24%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +25.3%	95−100 −25.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	344 +22.9%	280−290 −22.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +22.4%	85−90 −22.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	90−95 +24%	75−80 −24%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−110 +28.8%	80−85 −28.8%
Battlefield 5	180−190 +26%	150−160 −26%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +27%	100−105 −27%
Far Cry 5	139 +26.4%	110−120 −26.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	77 +28.3%	60−65 −28.3%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +24.3%	140−150 −24.3%
Hitman 3	130−140 +26.4%	110−120 −26.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	335 +24.1%	270−280 −24.1%
Metro Exodus	154 +28.3%	120−130 −28.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +25.3%	95−100 −25.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	227 +26.1%	180−190 −26.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	270 +22.7%	220−230 −22.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +22.4%	85−90 −22.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	90−95 +24%	75−80 −24%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−110 +28.8%	80−85 −28.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +27%	100−105 −27%
Far Cry 5	100−105 +25%	80−85 −25%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +24.3%	140−150 −24.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	230 +27.8%	180−190 −27.8%
Metro Exodus	137 +24.5%	110−120 −24.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	132 +32%	100−105 −32%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +22.4%	85−90 −22.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120

+25.3%

95−100
−25.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	120−130 +29%	100−105 −29%
Far Cry New Dawn	130−140 +22.7%	110−120 −22.7%
Hitman 3	70−75 +32.7%	55−60 −32.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +32.5%	40−45 −32.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65−70 +30%	50−55 −30%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70−75 +29.1%	55−60 −29.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90−95 +25.3%	75−80 −25.3%
Far Cry 5	127 +27%	100−105 −27%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +23.6%	110−120 −23.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	173 +23.6%	140−150 −23.6%
Metro Exodus	119 +25.3%	95−100 −25.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	153 +27.5%	120−130 −27.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	96 +28%	75−80 −28%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +24%	50−55 −24%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	114 +26.7%	90−95 −26.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 +24.3%	70−75 −24.3%
Hitman 3	50−55 +25%	40−45 −25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 +22.9%	70−75 −22.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	59 +31.1%	45−50 −31.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	79 +31.7%	60−65 −31.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +28.6%	35−40 −28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +22.9%	35−40 −22.9%
Battlefield 5	70−75 +23.3%	60−65 −23.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 +28%	50−55 −28%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +24%	75−80 −24%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95 +26.7%	75−80 −26.7%
Metro Exodus	67 +34%	50−55 −34%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +29.6%	27−30 −29.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60
+31.1%

45−50

−31.1%

This is how RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and RX 6700 compete in popular games:

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 29% faster in 1080p
RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 30% faster in 1440p
RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 38% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	59.23	48.41
Recency	18 May 2023	9 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	10 GB
Chip lithography	5 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	175 Watt