Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs Core i9-10900X

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-10900X and Ryzen Threadripper 1920 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	459	469
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	16.27	17.84
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Architecture codename	Cascade Lake-X (2019)	Zen (2017−2020)
Release date	19 October 2019 (4 years ago)	29 July 2017 (6 years ago)
Current price	$537	$270

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has 10% better value for money than i9-10900X.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10900X and Ryzen Threadripper 1920 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	10 (Deca-Core)	12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads	20	24
Base clock speed	3.7 GHz	3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	4.7 GHz	3.8 GHz
L1 cache	64K (per core)	96K (per core)
L2 cache	1 MB (per core)	512 KB (per core)
L3 cache	19.25 MB (shared)	32 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	14 nm
Die size	no data	213 mm2
Maximum core temperature	94 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	9,600 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	-
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	Yes

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10900X and Ryzen Threadripper 1920 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCLGA2066	SP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	140 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10900X and Ryzen Threadripper 1920. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512	no data
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
TSX	+	no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	+	no data
Status	Launched	no data

Security technologies

Core i9-10900X and Ryzen Threadripper 1920 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10900X and Ryzen Threadripper 1920 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	no data	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10900X and Ryzen Threadripper 1920. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2933	DDR4 Quad-channel
Maximum memory size	256 GB	no data
Max memory channels	4	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	94 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	-	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10900X and Ryzen Threadripper 1920.

PCIe version	3.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	48	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core i9-10900X outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1920 by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	14.55	14.27
Recency	19 October 2019	29 July 2017
Physical cores	10	12
Threads	20	24
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	140 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10900X and Ryzen Threadripper 1920, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---